From d653822a82aaa09bc9d2d0e8ac5e2ba5a45c87a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "G.E" <gregory.economou@vectorcamp.gr>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:53:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] the segfault we ran into, included_frag_id should be
 included_delay_frag_id.

---
 src/rose/rose_build_bytecode.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/rose/rose_build_bytecode.cpp b/src/rose/rose_build_bytecode.cpp
index 06f36582..2be7dbcd 100644
--- a/src/rose/rose_build_bytecode.cpp
+++ b/src/rose/rose_build_bytecode.cpp
@@ -2992,7 +2992,7 @@ void buildFragmentPrograms(const RoseBuildImpl &build,
                                                     pfrag.lit_ids);
         if (pfrag.included_delay_frag_id != INVALID_FRAG_ID &&
             !rebuild_prog.empty()) {
-            auto &cfrag = fragments[pfrag.included_delay_frag_id];
+            const auto &cfrag = fragments[pfrag.included_delay_frag_id];
             assert(pfrag.s.length() >= cfrag.s.length() &&
                    !pfrag.s.any_nocase() >= !cfrag.s.any_nocase());
             u32 child_offset = cfrag.delay_program_offset;